jump to navigation

Two US Senators Make Another Attempt At ‘Net Neutrality’ Bill January 10, 2007

Posted by notapundit in Congress, Politics, US News.
trackback

WASHINGTON (AP)–U.S. senators who support the idea that all Internet traffic should be treated equally by service providers are making a fresh attempt to pass “network neutrality” legislation, hoping that a new Democratic majority in Congress will improve a new bill’s chances.

Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, introduced the bill Tuesday. They were joined by six other Democratic senators.

Both AT&T Inc.’s (T) and Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) released statements shortly after the bill’s introduction, taking issue with the Dorgan-Snowe proposal.

The measure is identical to an amendment that died in the Senate Commerce Committee on an 11-11 vote in the last session of Congress.

The issue has gotten a higher profile thanks to AT&T’s decision to offer some network neutrality guarantees in order to secure approval for its $86 billion takeover of BellSouth Corp.

Dorgan said he thinks prospects for the bill are better this year thanks to the regime change, especially with the elevation of Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, to chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee. Inouye voted in favor of the amendment last year.

“I think we have a shot at getting this done,” Dorgan said. “It’s controversial, it’s not easy, but it’s really important public policy.”

The bill’s prospects in Congress may be better this year, but whether it will get past the White House is another question. Some of President George W. Bush’s top fundraisers are among the proposal’s biggest opponents.

Ivan Seidenberg, chairman and chief executive of Verizon, became a Bush “Pioneer” by raising at least $100,000 for the president’s 2004 campaign. AT&T Chairman and Chief Eexecutive Edward Whitacre Jr. made the “Ranger” list by collecting at least $200,000 for the president.

The White House didn’t return a call seeking comment.

AT&T’s Tim McKone, vice president of federal relations, wrote that it is unfortunate that “precious time is being spent on legislation that will impede, not increase, America’s standing” in the deployment of broadband.

Verizon’s Peter Davidson, senior vice president for federal government relations, wrote that net neutrality should be named “net regulation” and that lawmakers are “trying to solve a problem that doesn’t exist.”

The bill aims to require broadband service providers to “not block, interfere with, discriminate against, impair or degrade” Internet traffic.

Dorgan said his push was sparked in part by comments Whitacre and other industry executives have made arguing that companies like Google Inc. (GOOG) shouldn’t be able to use communications networks to carry their content for free.

“There’s going to have to be some mechanism for these people who use these pipes to pay for the portion they’re using,” Whitacre told BusinessWeek online in November 2005.

Comments»

No comments yet — be the first.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: